Summary: Summary pending

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: S.302,324,34 PPCMere abscontion is not a ground for rejection of bail (Bail allowed)

Summary: S.302,34 PPCNo occular & circumstantial evidence,wants further inquiry(Bail allowed)

Summary: PLJ 2015 Lahore 239 [Multan Bench Multan] Present SHAH KHAWAR J MUSHTAQ AHMAD and 13 others - - Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Secretary School Education Civil Secretariat Lahore and 5 others - - Respondents WP No 8151 of 2011 heard on 1762014 Constitution of Pakistan 1973 - - - - - - ART 199 - - PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS (APPOINTMENT AND CONDITIONSO F SERVICE) RULES 1974 - - SCOPE - - PUNJAB EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SCHOOL EDUCATIONR) ecruitment RULES 1987 - - SCOPE - - CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION - - GRADUATeEn glish TEACHERS - - SOME EQUALLY SCHOOL TEACHERS WERREE GULARIZED BY PST - - DEROGATION OF CRITERIA SET FOR appointment - - Regularize SERVICE OF SCHOOL TEACHERS - - VALIDITY - - ALL GRADUeAnTEg lish TEACHERS SHALL BE TREATED AS CIVIL SERVANTS FOR ALL INTENDS AND PURPOSEtSe rINm s OF PUNJAB CIVIL SERVANTS (APPOINTMENT AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) RULES1 974 READ WITH PUNJAB EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (SCHOOL EDUCATION) RECRUITMERNTu les 1987 wef date of joining respectively - - That any law or rule can only be given retrospective effect if same is in benefit of an individual and not to his detriment - - It IS BY NOW A WELL SETTLED PRINCIPAL OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION THAT INSERTION OR DELOEFT IAONNY PROVISION IN RULES OR LAW IF MERELY PROCEDURAL IN NATURE WOULD APPLY retrospectively but not if it effects substantial rights which already stood accrued at time when un amended rule or provision was in vogue - - Policy could only be VALID TO EXTENT OF SERVICE BENEFITS TO PETITIONERS AS WELL AS ALL GRADeUnAgTEli sh TEACHERS BUT NOT TO MAKE THEM PENALIZEDU NDER PEEDA ACT 2006 AND RULES 1974 - - Graduate english TEACHERS SHALL BE PROCEEDED AGAINST WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT UNDER PEEDA A2C0T0 6 AND RULES 1974 IS HEREBY SET - ASIDE - - INITIATION OF INQUIRY against PETITIONERS BY RESPONDENTS IS ALSO QUASHED AND RESPONDENTS ARE DIRECTED TROE GULARIZE SERVICES OF PETITIONERS AND MAY BE PROMOTED IN NEXT SCALE - - PETITION was allowed [Pp244 245] A B C D Mr Muhammad Masood Bilal Advocate for Petitioners (in WP No 8151 8639 8534 of 2011 28582007 65732008) Ms Abida Nasreen Siddiqui DEO (Woman) EE Khanewal for RespondentsJudgement Result:Petitions allowed

Summary: Summary pending

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: S.419,420 PPC,30 NADRA Act,36/37 ETO-2002Prima facie connected with commission of offence,effected recovery,heinous offence(Bail dismissed)