Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE SECONDARY EDUCATION PESHAWAR VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Citation: 1991 PSC 612

Case No: CIVIL APPEALS No. U-P 12-P/1984

Judgment Date: 17-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Muhammad Afzal Zullah

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD SHAHID VS THE UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR THROUGH ITS VICE CHANCELLOR PESHAWAR

Citation: PLD 1991 Peshawar 79, PLD 1991 PHC 79

Case No: WP No. 527/1990

Judgment Date: 17-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Raza Ahmad Khan

Summary: Summary pending.

BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE SECONDARYEDUCATION PESHAWAR VS MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Citation: PLD 1991 Supreme Court 479, PLD 1991 SC 479

Case No: CIVIL APPEALS Nos. U-P AND 12-P/1984

Judgment Date: 17-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Muhammad Afzal Zullah

Summary: Summary pending.

NATIONAL BOOK FOUNDATION VS MST WAZIR BEGUM

Citation: 1992 CLC 464

Case No: CM APPLICATION No. 1400/1990 (IN FIRST RENT APPEAL No. 584/1990)

Judgment Date: 17-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice Syed Abdur Rehman

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF VS MST SHAMM AKHTAR

Citation: 1993 CLC 2468

Case No: W. P. No. 397/1989

Judgment Date: 17-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Bcfo

Summary: Summary pending.

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN VS RAIS KHAN

Citation: 1993 SCMR 609

Case No: CIVIL APPEAL No. 204/1988

Judgment Date: 17-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Muhammad Afzal Zullah

Summary: Summary pending.

Sycd BASHIR HUSSAN SHAH Versus INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others

Citation: PLJ 1991 TrC 153, PLJ 1991 Tribunal Cases 153

Case No: Case-15-1991

Judgment Date: 17/02/1991

Jurisdiction: Tribunals

Judge: Justice Sardar Muhammad Sajawal Khan

Summary: Background: The appellant, a retired Head Constable, filed an appeal with the Service Tribunal challenging his compulsory retirement ordered by the Superintendent of Police (Reserves) in 1983. The appellant claimed he had been wrongfully implicated in a criminal case, which led to his forced leave and subsequent compulsory retirement without due process. The appellant argued that his compulsory retirement was based on an inquiry conducted in his absence without cross-examination or a show-cause notice. He also contended that compulsory retirement is not listed as a punishment under the Police Rules, making the retirement order void. However, the respondents argued that the appeal was time-barred and that the appellant had not exhausted all departmental remedies before approaching the Tribunal. -----Issues: 1- Whether the appellant’s appeal was maintainable, given his alleged failure to exhaust departmental remedies. -----2- Whether the appeal was time-barred under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Appeal Rules. -----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome: The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as non-maintainable and time-barred, holding that the appellant did not demonstrate that he had filed a departmental appeal before bringing his case to the Tribunal. Although he claimed to have appealed to the Inspector General of Police, he provided no documentary evidence, and any appeal should have first been directed to the Deputy Inspector General of Police as required by the rules. Furthermore, the Tribunal determined that the appeal was filed after an unreasonable delay of six years, far exceeding the 60-day limitation for original orders and 30-day limitation for final appellate orders under the AJK Appeal Rules. The Tribunal concluded that the delay and procedural deficiencies rendered the appeal inadmissible. -----Citations/Precedents: Section 12(2), Civil Procedure Code (C.P.C.) – Governs appeals and the requirement to pursue departmental remedies prior to Tribunal appeals. Azad Jammu and Kashmir Appeal Rules – Specifies a 60-day limit for appeals against original orders and a 30-day limit for appeals against final appellate orders. Police Rules – The absence of compulsory retirement as a prescribed punishment does not negate procedural requirements for appeal filing and adherence to limitation periods.

MST BADSHAH BEGUM OTHERSS VS BARADRI KASHMIRI

Citation: 1991 CLC 1573

Case No: CR No. 645/1978

Judgment Date: 16-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Munir A

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM OTHERSS VS CH MUHAMMAD IDREES THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS

Citation: 1991 CLC 780

Case No: WP No. L$31/1983

Judgment Date: 16-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum

Summary: Summary pending.

MUHAMMAD ALTAF KHAN VS MIRZA RAFAQAT AHMED AN

Citation: 1991 CLC 1410

Case No: WPS Nos. 2323 AND 2324/1983

Judgment Date: 16-02-1991

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Malik Muhammad Qayyum

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top