Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Summary pending.

Summary: Background: A cooperative housing society challenged the orders from the Registrar's nominee and the Appellate Authority. These orders had accepted a petition against the cancellation of a member's society membership and the provisional allotment of a plot. The society claimed that the cancellation was due to the member's failure to clear dues, an action approved in the Annual General Meeting (AGM). ----Issues: 1- Was the cancellation of the membership and plot allotment valid? ----2- Did the society act with ulterior motives and violate due process? ----3- Were the orders of the Registrar's nominee and Appellate Authority lawful and justified? ----Holding/Reasoning/Outcome: Clash of Egos and Ulterior Motives: The court found that there was a personal conflict between the society's management committee and the member’s representative, leading to actions motivated by malice. Evidence from correspondence demonstrated the committee's hostility towards the member and her representative. Due Process Violations: The member had made substantial payments to the society, and the cancellation of her rights was based on weak grounds. The society’s actions were seen as driven by personal vendetta rather than legitimate reasons related to non-payment. Lawful Authority and Fair Procedure: The authorities (Registrar's nominee, Deputy Registrar, and Chief Commissioner) issued their orders lawfully, following proper procedures and ensuring fair hearings for both parties. The society's conduct was consistently ambiguous and unethical, failing to respect the member's rights and due process. Custodians of Members' Rights: Cooperative societies' management should protect members' rights. The society’s cancellation of membership without a hearing violated the principle of "audi alteram partem" (hear the other side). The High Court dismissed the petition, upholding the orders of the Registrar's nominee and the Appellate Authority. The court directed the society to implement these orders and emphasized the necessity for cooperative societies to act in members' best interests without personal bias and unethical behavior. -----Citations/Precedents: PLD 2005 SC 193: Arshad Mehmood's case PLD 2010 SC 759: Human Rights Cases Nos. 4668, 1111/07 & 15283-G/2010 2007 SCMR 410: Miss Shazia Batool v. Government of Balochistan and others 2007 SCMR 1620: Thal Industries Corporation Limited v. Government of the Punjab

Summary: S.13 Pre-emption Act,S.52 TPA,47 Registration Act:Requirement of Talabs,principle of lis pendens,registered document when to take effect