Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
DIGITAL MEDIA SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITEDTHROUGH COMPANY SECRETARY VS WARID TELECOM PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH FAISAL SAEED
Summary: Summary pending.
MIAN MUHAMMAD SHER S VS MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJABLAHORE
Summary: Summary pending.
NISAR AHMAD SIDDIQUI VS ESCANTONMENT BOARD
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD SHARIF VS JUDGE ANTI TERRORISIM COURT
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD AMIN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
BACHAL S VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
HUB ALI S VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
SAFDAR AL VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD ASIM RAFIQUE and 11 others Versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED, ISLAMABAD through its President and 7 others
Summary: PLJ 2012 Lahore 32 Present Muhammad Khalid Mehmood Khan J MUHAMMAD ASIM RAFIQUE and 11 others - - Petitioners versus ZARAI TARAQIATI BANK LIMITED ISLAMABAD through its President and 7 others - - Respondents WP No 13387 and 1695 of 2010 decided on 1132011 Bank Staff Rules 2005 - - - - - - R 6 - - Contractual employ - - Changed terms of appointment - - Appointment was on contract basis for period of 2 years - - Violation of Rules 2005 - - Entitlement of Regularization of Services - - Act of Bank was mala fide and of no legal effect - - Question of - - Whether contract between parties enable petitioner to claim right of permanent employment and whether contract was with free consents and knowledge - - Validity - - Contract employ can be appointed only for a specific job for duration not acceding 3 years in aggregate and such terms and conditions as determined by competent authority and clog for grant of contract service was only that person had not been retired or relieved from service of bank under terms of Golden Hand Scheme - - Concept of management trainee was not available in Bank Staff Rules - - New concept was introduced by drafter of contract only to avoid application of Staff Rules 2005 - - Petition was allowed [Pp 35 38 42] A B E Terms of Contract Employee - - - - - - Contract of petitioners was basically a contract of probationary officer as provided in regulations of bank and ratio of probationary officer was applicable on petitioner [P 39] C Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908) - - - - - - S 20 - - Islamabad High Court Act (XVII of 2010) S 4 - - Jurisdiction - - Entire shareh olding was with Federal Govt and Provincial Govt - - Federation was party - - Validity - - Jurisdiction of Islamabad High Court was restricted to Islambad Capital Territory - - No doubtr egistered office was at Islamabad but bank was corporation and was carrying its business all over Pakistan including Multan and as such case of Petitioner was covered uS 20 CPC - - Cause of action arose within jurisdiction to entertain and decided these petitions [P 42] D Mr Muhammad Suleman Bhatti Advocate for Petitioners Mr Javed Iqbal Ansari Advocate for RespondentsJudgement Result:Petition allowed
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE ISSUED TO JS GLOBAL CAPITAL LIMITED IN THE MATTER OF
Summary: Summary pending.