Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

REHMAT ZEB VS THE STATE

Citation: 2013 PCrLJ 864

Case No: J. CR. A. No. 89 AND MURDER REFERENCE No. 5/2012

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Mazhar Alam Khan Miankhel

Summary: Summary pending.

FARMAN ALI ALIAS BHOLI VS THE STATE

Citation: 2013 PCrLJ 1847

Case No: C.A No. 944/2006

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Sh. Ahmad Farooq

Summary: Summary pending.

CIVIL PETITION NO L OF

Citation: 2013 PSC 474

Case No: CP No. 2073-L/2009

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Mian Saqib Nisar

Summary: Summary pending.

IMRAN KHAN VS ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

Citation: 2013 PSC 377

Case No: CP No. 31/2011 45/2007 111 AND 123/2012

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudiiry

Summary: Summary pending.

KHALID MEHMOOD VS CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB ETC

Citation: 2013 PSC 501

Case No: CP No. 912-L/2011

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Tassaduq Hussain Ju

Summary: Summary pending.

IMRAN KHAN VS ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

Citation: PLD 2013 Supreme Court 120, PLD 2013 SC 120

Case No: CP Nos. 31/2011 45/2007 111 AND 123/2012

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry

Summary: Summary pending.

ABAID ULLAH MALIK VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE MIANWALI

Citation: PLD 2013 Supreme Court 239, PLD 2013 SC 239

Case No: CP No. 2073-L/2009

Judgment Date: 05-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Mian Saqib Nisar

Summary: Summary pending.

Rehmat Zeb vs State.

Citation: 2013 PCrLJ 864

Case No: J.Cr.A.No. 9 & MR No.5

Judgment Date: 05/12/2012

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: S.302,84 PPCOverwhelming evidence,testimony of related witnesses(Appeal dismissed)

Imran Khan v. Election Commission of Pakistan, etc

Citation: PLD 2013 SC 120, 2012 SCP 77

Case No: CONST.P.31/2011

Judgment Date: 05/12/2012

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Sh. Azmat Saeed

Summary: ''The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) under Article 218(3) of the Constitution is charged with the duty to ensure free, fair and just elections in the country. ECP, under Article 219 of the Constitution, is also commanded to revise the electoral list annually. The electoral rolls of Karachi do not inspire confidence. An accurate Electoral Roll is a sine quo non for the holding of a free, fair and transparent election. Thus, ECP is directed to carry out proper and complete door-to-door verification in Karachi so as to ensure that no voter is disenfranchised or dislocated and all other discrepancies are rectified as early as possible.'' --- The statement highlights concerns regarding discrepancies in the Electoral Roll of Karachi, emphasizing the importance of a reliable voter list for free and fair elections. The petitioner's examples, coupled with the Election Commission's admission of not conducting a comprehensive door-to-door verification, lead to the conclusion that the Electoral Rolls of Karachi lack credibility. The court references a previous case, stressing the significance of accurate electoral lists for democratic strengthening.The court notes that Article 219 of the Constitution mandates annual revision of Electoral Rolls, as communicated by the Election Commission. However, delays in the process are acknowledged, with a significant number of unverified voters reported. The court directs the Election Commission to conduct a thorough door-to-door verification in Karachi with the assistance of the Army and Frontier Corps, emphasizing the importance of preventing disenfranchisement.The term "annual" is scrutinized, and the court quotes various dictionaries and legal precedents to support the argument that it should be interpreted broadly, potentially allowing for revisions during the year. The judgment underscores the duty of the Election Commission, as outlined in Article 218, to ensure free, fair, and transparent elections, and it calls for collaboration with executive authorities to achieve this goal.The court concludes by highlighting the fundamental right of citizens to vote and directs the Election Commission to revise the Electoral Rolls in Karachi promptly, addressing discrepancies and ensuring the involvement of security forces due to the city's security situation. Two Constitution Petitions are disposed of accordingly, while another is adjourned to a later date.

DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY LAHORE THROUGH SECRETARY VS MST AMT UL QAYYUM

Citation: 2014 MLD 497

Case No: CR No. 577/2012

Judgment Date: 04-12-2012

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Mehmood Maqbool Bajwa

Summary: Summary pending.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top