Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Search Results: Categories: NEPRA (29 found)

M/s Tauheed International Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 2108/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: [Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7) In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

M/s Mehboob Re-Rollings Mills and Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 2330/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7)------ In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

M/s Noor Leather Garments Pvt Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 2002/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: [Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7) In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

M/s Majeed & Sons Steel Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 2052/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7)) In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

Aisha Steel Mills Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 603/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7))In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

Pakistan Beverage Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 2101/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

M/s Garibsons Pvt Ltd (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 597/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7))In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

M/s Pakistan Gum Ind. Pvt Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 2044/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: [Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7)) In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

Alucan (Pvt) Ltd & Ors (Petitioner) V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)

Citation: N/A

Case No: 1961/2020 Const. P.

Judgment Date: 23-AUG-21

Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 (Section 31 (7)) In light of the foregoing, we reach to an irresistible conclusion that the exercise of passing monthly FCA on to the petitioners on the basis of NEPRAs determination dated 27.12.2019 is in accordance with law and the timeline provided under Section 31(7) of the Act, 1997 be adhered to, unless any party is restricted for a reason beyond its control, which is a case at hand. The Petitioners clearly failed to avail statutory remedies under the law while the impugned determination was being made and even thereafter, nonetheless there is no cavil that the petitioners owe FCA component to K-Electric and liable to satisfy this debt. These instant Petitions being devoid of merit are accordingly dismissed.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.08.1OBS.

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top