Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

GHULAM JILANI ETC VS ADJ ETC

Citation: 2026 LHC 3424

Case No: Writ Petition-Civil Proceedings-Possession 14078-18

Judgment Date: 04-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muzamil Akhtar Shabir

Summary: Order of withdrawal of petition passed on application filed by an unauthorized person recalled by holding that as the said order was void ab initio and had no legal existence, hence, question of limitation would not arise.

MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE ETC VS MUHAMMAD SHABBIR ETC

Citation: 2026 LHC 3741

Case No: Civil Revision 1794802.1378-15

Judgment Date: 04-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad

Summary: Registration Act, 1908 --- Sections 32, 34, 77 ---Scope of suit under Section 77 confined to examining legality of refusal of registration and not validity of underlying transaction or title ---Power of attorney stands extinguished upon death of principal under Section 201 of the Contract Act, 1872.Where the principal had died before completion of the registration process, the attorney ceased to possess lawful authority to act on his behalf; consequently, refusal of registration by the Sub-Registrar was held lawful and justified.Appellate Court's reversal of the Trial Court's judgment found to be based on misreading and non-reading of evidence ---Judgment of Appellate Court set aside and dismissal of suit under Section 77 restored.Dismissal of a suit under Section 77 does not bar an independent suit for specific performance, as the remedies under the Registration Act and the Specific Relief Act operate in distinct fields and arise from separate causes of action.

THE STATE VS INTIZAR HUSSAIN SHAH

Citation: 2026 LHC 3766

Case No: Capital Sentence Reference-ATA 01-25

Judgment Date: 04-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Tanveer Ahmad Sheikh

Summary: Summary pending

MUHMMAD JAMEEL VS THE ADJ ETC

Citation: 2026 LHC 4207

Case No: Writ Petition-Family-Jactitation of Marriage 6494-25

Judgment Date: 04-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Anwaar Hussain

Summary: Following question of law has been put forth for determination by this Court: "What is the correct approach for a Court while appreciating evidence in cases where an alleged love marriage is relied upon by one party and allegations of abduction, coercion or forced marriage are raised by the other?" Held that while dealing with such cases, where the parties are completely strangers, the Courts are obligated to inquire as to how the alleged relationship originated and ultimately matured into a decision to contract marriage against wishes of the family. While the law does not require proof of a relationship through call records, social media exchanges, photographs or other forms of electronic communication, the complete absence of any material explaining the genesis of the alleged relationship remains a relevant circumstance while evaluating the plea of a consensual love marriage. Absence of any prior connection between the parties, becomes significant qua explanation as to how the alleged relationship came into existence.

Muhammad Iqbal v. The State through Attorney General for Pakistan and another

Citation: 2026 SCP 173

Case No: Crl.P.L.A.449-L/2026

Judgment Date: 03/06/2026

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan

Summary: Summary pending

Javed Iqbal v. The State through Prosecutor General Punjab,Lahore and another

Citation: 2026 SCP 174

Case No: Crl.P.L.A.450-L/2026

Judgment Date: 03/06/2026

Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Judge: Justice Shahid Bilal Hassan

Summary: Summary pending

Ashba Kamran Vs NEPRA through its Chairman etc

Citation: 2026 LHC 3378

Case No: Misc. Writ 32881/26

Judgment Date: 03-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Ahmad Nadeem Arshad

Summary: Doctrine of judicial restraint?Economic and regulatory policies fall within the exclusive domain of the Executive and Legislature?Constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 is confined to examining legality of decision-making process and not the merits or wisdom of policy decisions?Interference declined.

MUHAMMAD AJMAL VS STATE ETC

Citation: 2026 LHC 3442

Case No: Crl. Misc.-Post-arrest Bail 3141-B-26

Judgment Date: 03-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Amjad Rafiq

Summary: Spousal abuse constitutes an offence implicitly recognized under the Pakistan Penal Code.

Mushtaq Hussain shah through Legal Heirs Vs Province of Punjab etc

Citation: 2026 LHC 3523

Case No: Civil Revision 70734/23

Judgment Date: 03-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi

Summary: Summary pending

Imtiaz Ahmad etc Vs Abdul Hameed alias Majeed etc

Citation: 2026 LHC 3516

Case No: Civil Revision 158/19

Judgment Date: 03-06-2026

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Muhammad Sajid Mehmood Sethi

Summary: Summary pending

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.08.1OBS.

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top