Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN AFZAL VS ZIAULLAH
Summary: Summary pending.
MST NAWABZADI VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
MST KALSOOM VS LIAQAT NATIONAL HOSPITAL THROUGH MEDICAL DIRECTOR OR ADMINISTRATOR
Summary: Summary pending.
HASHMAT ULLAH S VS THE STATE RESPONDEIT
Summary: Summary pending.
MESSRS AWAN ELECTRONICS PVT LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE VS SNATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH BRANCH MANAGER
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD NAZIR VS MUHAMMAD FEROZE
Summary: Summary pending.
MAQBOOL AHMAD VS EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD
Summary: Summary pending.
The COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT CUSTOMS HOUSE KARACHI vs ABDUL RAZZAQ and another
Summary: Summary pending
M/S PAKISTAN KUWAIT INVESTMENT COMPANY Versus BANK AL-FALAH LIMITED and 11 others
Summary: PLJ 2003 Lahore 702 (DB) [Rawalpindi Bench Rawalpindi] Present MAULVI ANAWR - UL - HAQ AND ABDUL SHAKOOR PARACHA JJ MS PAKISTAN KUWAIT INVESTMENT COMPANY (PVT) LTD - Appellant versus BANK AL - FALAH LIMITED and 11 others - Respondents FAO No 30 of 1998 heard on 1102002 (i) Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans Advances Credits and Finances) Act 1997 (XV of 1997) - - Ss 21 27 - - Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) S 12 (2) - Application under S 12 (2) CPC before Judge Banking Court and appeal under S 21 of Act XV of 1997 whether maintainable - Judgment and decree of Banking Court subject to provision of appeal would attain finality and same could not be called in question - Application under S 12 (2) of CPC as also appeal under S 21 (4) of Act XV of 1997 would not be competent against rejection of application would not be competent against Judgment and decree rendered by Banking Court [P 704] A 2003 Ms PAKISTAN KUWAIT INVESTMENT Co (Pvr) LTD v Lah 703 bank al - falah limited (Abdul Shakoor Paracha J) (ii) Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1968) - - - S 12 (2) - - Dismissal of application under S 12 (2) of CPC without framing of issues - - Legality - - No substantial question of fact and law having been raised in application under S 12 (2) of CPC which could have been decided after framing of issues and recording of evidence Banking Court was not obliged to frame issues [P 706] B (iii) Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908) - - i - S 12 (2) - Banking Companies (Recovery of Loans AdvancesC redits and Finances) Act (XV of 1997 S 21 - Dismissal of application under S 12 (2) CPC before Banking Court - Appeal under S 21 of Act (XV of 1997) was not competent against dismissal of application Under S 12 (2) of CPC [P 707] C 2000 MLD 421 2000 CLC 1330 PLD 1998 Karachi 338 PLD 1993 SC 109 PLD 2000 Lah 162 2000 CLC 166 and 1993 SCMR 662 ref Mr M Bilal Advocate for Appellant Mr Ehsan Ahmad Khawaja Advocate for RespondentsJudgement Result:Appeal dismissed.
GARRISON ENGINEERS DP VS MS ALSTOM PAKISTAN PVT LTD
Summary: Summary pending.