Step 1 of 8
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7
Welcome!
Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)
BASHIRAN BIBI VS CITY POLICE OFFICER FAISALABAD
Summary: Summary pending.
MUHAMMAD BILAL VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.
Muhammad Bilal etc Vs KMU
Summary: Art.199 Constitution of Pakistan, 1973.Admission of students, affiliation of Private Medical College lacking required criteria.
Action Against Distribution of Development Funds by Ex-Prime Minister Raja Parvez Ashraf
Summary: ''The Constitution does not permit the use/allocation of funds to MNAs/MPAs/Notables at the sole discretion of the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister. The National Assembly, while giving assent to a grant which is to be utilized by the Executive at its discretion, has to follow the procedure provided in Articles 80 to 84 of the Constitution as well as the Rules of Procedure, 2007.'' --- The document discusses the absence of an Act of Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) enacted under Article 79 of the Constitution. Instead, it relies on Government Financial Rules (GFR) issued pre-independence but continued by the Indian Independence Act, 1947 and adapted by Article 268 of the Constitution of 1973. The GFR outlines financial powers, procedures, and standards of financial propriety for authorities under the Federal Government.The role of the Principal Accounting Officer, Financial Advisor, and Deputy Financial Advisor in ministries/divisions is highlighted, particularly concerning Supplementary Grants and Re-Appropriation. The document emphasizes the need for detailed estimates and item-wise specificity in grant demands for the Annual Budget Statement.It questions the discretionary allocation of funds to MNAs/MPAs/Notables, asserting that the Constitution doesn't permit such discretion. The document suggests that any practice allowing such allocations is unconstitutional. The procedure for supplementary grants and re-appropriation is reiterated, emphasizing adherence to constitutional provisions and rules.The Chief Justice concludes by emphasizing the structured exercise of discretionary powers, the illegality of discretionary fund allocations to individuals, and the need for adherence to constitutional procedures in budgetary matters.
The STATE through Regional Director/Force Commander AntiNarcotic Force Balochistan vs MUHAMMAD BAKHSHAL and another
Summary: Summary pending
GHULAM SARWAR KHAN VS CHAIRMAN PUNJAB BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION
Summary: Summary pending.
SHAHBAZ AFTAB KHAN VS JUDGE FAMILY COURT
Summary: Summary pending.
SYED NADEEM ABBAS VS MST SADIA FID A KHAN
Summary: Summary pending.
AMEER HASSAN VS THE STATE
Summary: Summary pending.