Loading... Account
Dark Mode
Step 1 of 8

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.
Step 1 of 7

Welcome!

Let's learn how to use the search features effectively.

Latest Judgments (All Jurisdictions within Pakistan)

Collector of Customs Vs Ms. Bashir Pipe etc

Citation: 2025 LHC 5586

Case No: C.Ref.(Custom Reference) 29083/25

Judgment Date: 15-09-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh

Summary: Under Section 194C of the Customs Act, 1969, Chairman of the Customs Appellate Tribunal is empowered to constitute Benches consisting of Single Member.

Muhammad Nouman Shakir etc. Vs The State

Citation: 2025 LHC 5686, PLJ 2026 CrC 1

Case No: Jail Appeal 39518/22

Judgment Date: 15-09-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Chief Justice Aalia Neelum

Summary: When it can be gathered from the circumstances of the case that accused lost his temperament in the heat of passion while seeing that his mother was being assaulted or threatened by the complainant side and causing injury to the deceased without any premeditation, then case attracts section 302 (c) PPC instead of 302(b) PPC.

Ms Chenab Engineering Works & Foundries Pvt Ltd Vs Federation of Pakistan etc.

Citation: 2025 LHC 5752

Case No: Tax (Writ) 4404/21

Judgment Date: 15-09-2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Malik Javid Iqbal Wains

Summary: The language of the statute is unequivocal. It confers upon the Board a broad administrative discretion to reassign jurisdiction in the interest of efficient tax administration, institutional coherence, and functional specialization. The use of the phrase "transfer of jurisdiction" in Section 209(8A) of the Ordinance, 2001 must be interpreted purposively and in light of the scheme of the Ordinance, which envisages a dynamic and responsive tax machinery capable of adapting to administrative exigencies.

Nasir Zakir Vs The State etc

Citation: 2025 LHC 5549, PLJ 2025 CrC 807

Case No: Crl. Appeal 67752/22

Judgment Date: 15/09/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Abher Gul Khan

Summary: Summary pending

Collector of Customs Vs Ms Bashir Pipe etc

Citation: 2025 LHC 5586

Case No: C.Ref.(Custom Reference) 29083/25

Judgment Date: 15/09/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh

Summary: Under Section 194C of the Customs Act, 1969, Chairman of the Customs Appellate Tribunal is empowered to constitute Benches consisting of Single Member. 276Crl. Appeal 67752/22 Nasir Zakir Vs The State etc Justice Abher Gul Khan 15- 09- 2025 2025 LHC 5549 PLJ 2025 Cr.C 807 (Lahore High Court, Lahore)

Muhammad Nouman Shakir etc Vs The State

Citation: 2025 LHC 5686

Case No: Jail Appeal 39518/22

Judgment Date: 15/09/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Chief Justice Aalia Neelum

Summary: When it can be gathered from the circumstances of the case that accused lost his temperament in the heat of passion while seeing that his mother was being assaulted or threatened by the complainant side and causing injury to the deceased without any premeditation, then case attracts section 302 (c) PPC instead of 302(b) PPC. 275C.Ref. (Custom Reference) 29083/25 Collector of Customs Vs Ms. Bashir Pipe etc Mr. Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh 15-09- 2025 2025 LHC 5586

Ms Chenab Engineering Works & Foundries Pvt Ltd Vs Federation of Pakistan etc

Citation: 2025 LHC 5752

Case No: Tax (Writ) 4404/21

Judgment Date: 15/09/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Malik Javid Iqbal Wains

Summary: The language of the statute is unequivocal. It confers upon the Board a broad administrative discretion to reassign jurisdiction in the interest of efficient tax administration, institutional coherence, and functional specialization. The use of the phrase "transfer of jurisdiction" in Section 209(8A) of the Ordinance, 2001 must be interpreted purposively and in light of the scheme of the Ordinance, which envisages a dynamic and responsive tax machinery capable of adapting to administrative exigencies. 274Jail Appeal 39518/22 Muhammad Nouman Shakir etc. Vs The State The Chief Justice 15- 09- 2025 2025 LHC 5686

MUSHTAQ AHMED VS THE STATE ETC

Citation: 2025 LHC 5879

Case No: Crl. Appeal-Against Acquittal-PPC 481-22

Judgment Date: 15/09/2025

Jurisdiction: Lahore High Court

Judge: Justice Raja Ghazanfar Ali Khan

Summary: Summary pending

Mujeeb Ur Rehman etc Vs Federation of Pakistan etc

Citation: 2025 PHC 5911

Case No: W.P No. 241-P of 2025

Judgment Date: 15-09-2025

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice

Summary: Rule 12, 13 and 14 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Births, Death , Marriages and Divorce or Dissolution of Marriages (Registration and Certification) Rules 2021, were held to be directory in nature rather than mandatory and its non-observance could not therefore be given the effect of refusal in registration of valid marriages between the parties. Same rules were also found to be having prospective operation not affecting the marriages that had taken place earlier.

Syed Akbar Khan Vs Govt. of KP

Citation: 2025 PHC 5149

Case No: C.R No. 183-B of 2025

Judgment Date: 15-09-2025

Jurisdiction: Peshawar High Court

Judge: Justice Hammad Tariq Afridi

Summary: Writ Petition. Civil Revision --- Constitution (Twenty-Fifth Amendment) Act, 2018 --- Frontier Crimes Regulations (FCR), repeal of --- FATA merger into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa --- Effect --- Maliki/Lungi Allowance --- Scope --- The petitioner’s suit for declaration and injunction claiming entitlement to Maliki/Lungi Allowance was dismissed by trial court on the ground of failure to prove entitlement, which findings was upheld by the appellate Court. Held, although the courts below did not advert to the most material legal aspect, i.e., repeal of FCR and abolition of Maliki/Lungi System after FATA merger, yet their ultimate conclusion in dismissing the claim did not warrant interference. The system of Maliki/Lungi allowance, being relic of the old tribal administrative structure, has lost all legal recognition after the constitutional amendment. However, if Government revives or reintroduces such a system through legislation or policy, aggrieved persons may approach the competent forum for redress. --- Findings of Courts below maintained--- Revision Petition dismissed.

Disclaimer: AI/GPT is not a substitute for legal advice. The content on this website is for research only. In case of breach of T.O.S, PLDB reserves the right to revoke or ban membership at any time without notice. Pak Legal Database ® 2023-2026. All Rights Reserved. Version 4.05.2a. Designed & developed by theblinklabs.com

error: Content Protection Enabled
Scroll to Top